Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Gov Christie Nominates Muslim Justice

I don’t know why I continue to be shocked by this kind of thing, but I do. A Muslim cannot swear allegiance to the Constitution and remain Muslim. His loyalty is to Allah and Allah’s laws: Sharia. I don’t understand why a man as intelligent as Christie (and so many other elected officials) can be so stupid when it comes to that simple fact. It is Christie’s (and all other elected officials) DUTY to know that simple fact. It’s not that hard to come across that fact in Christie’s line of work. And just think: New Jersyites will have TWO Allah-loyal justices on his Superior Court if he appoints Sohail Mohammed.

[Bracketed notes are mine — Dorrie]



Lawyer for Post-9/11 Detainees Tapped for N.J. bench
TRENTON (AP) — Gov. Chris Christie, the former federal prosecutor who oversaw several terrorism-related cases after the Sept. 11 attacks, said Thursday that one of his nominations for a Superior Court judgeship will be a lawyer who represented many detainees swept up by the government in the post-9/11 dragnet.

Sohail Mohammed of Clifton won the respect of federal, state, and local law enforcement agencies [which doesn’t take much these days, and has resulted in Rep Peter King having to investigate the whole lot of ’em] stemming from his work in the aftermath of the terror attacks, trying to build bridges [nothing could be a bigger alert than that phrase that this guy is Muslim Brotherhood: Seyyid Qutb clearly writes in Milestones that the only bridge that needs to be built between Muslims and non-Muslims is for non-Muslims to get to Islam, NOT the other way around] between law enforcement and the Muslim community.

Christie announced his intention to nominate Mohammed, along with six other potential judges, Thursday evening.

Mohammed declined to comment when reached at his home. But Ibrahim Hooper, a spokesman for the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Washington, D.C., praised Christie’s move.

“It’s just more evidence of the growth and maturity of the American Muslim community and our contributions to American society,” he said. “We have a large number of young Muslim attorneys coming up [gee, I wonder why? Couldn’t be that they know the best way to destroy our Constitution/country is thru the law, could it?] through the legal system, which is a fairly recent trend. It used to be that Muslim parents wanted their children to become doctors or engineers.”

Christie, a Republican entering his second year in office, still must formally nominate Mohammed, whose candidacy would then be reviewed by the Senate Judiciary Committee before a vote by the full Senate.

Mohammed was on former Gov. Jon Corzine’s short list of potential judicial appointees in the last two years of the Democrat’s lone term in office, but he was not nominated. He would serve on the court in Passaic County.

A board member of the American Muslim Union, Mohammed worked hard in the aftermath of the 2001 attacks to try to foster trust [of course; the MB saw 40 years of underhanded-propaganda work in the US on the edge of going to waste thanks to OBL] between American Muslims and law enforcement, particularly federal officials. As U.S. attorney for New Jersey, Christie was a regular guest at the group’s annual Ramadan dinner and spoke highly of Mohammed’s interaction with authorities. [So NJ has been going the way of Michigan for some time now, huh? I didn’t know.]

Mohammed helped arrange a law enforcement job fair [of course! How better to know how to compromise law enforecement than be a part of it?] at a Paterson mosque in which young Muslims were encouraged to apply for jobs with law enforcement agencies. The session also featured a frank question-and-answer session between police and prosecutors and mosque members, after which both sides said they came away with a better understanding of the other. [No, only the Muslims came away with a better understanding of how to work the system.]

He was also asked to give numerous training sessions to FBI agents on Islam and Muslim culture, to enable agents to better understand the religion and the practices of Muslims. [And where did the Muslims get their sensitivity training on how to be better Americans? To move aside for Christians? To work with the Jewish community? Probably never even came up in these “training” sessions.]

Mohammed would become the second Muslim Superior Court judge in New Jersey [I was born in NJ; sadly, I can tell I’m never going back; it’s gone too much to the dark side, for me] if confirmed. Last year, Hani Mawla was confirmed to the state bench in Somerset County.

Posted in CAIR, ELected officials support sharia, homegrown jihad, Muslim Brotherhood, national security, Political Islam, sharia law, terrorism, U.S. Constitution | Leave a comment

VIDEO: (7minutes): "We need to behead democracy from its roots . . .

. . . everyday we should attack their systems and replace it with Islam.”


From Memri TV. Take heed. This is how open and honest the Muslim leaders are in England. The Believers didn’t assimilate in Britain, they multiplied themselves until they are a major force in the country, and now these parasites are making their open moves to destroy their host country.

We are seeing many more monster mosques rising around our country, in our cities, in our counties. Why? To form monster Islamic settlements, designed to be separate entities from America. And what will the attendees to these mosques hear? The same thoughts and words that come from this guy. The results will give new meaning to “homegrown jihad.”

Right now even Obamacare sounds better than what we’d be looking at from a future of servitude under Islamic rule. We need to bring this info into everyday conversation, just like we do Obamacare, the stimulus, abortion, border control (especially!), controlling spending . . . We can do it, and we must.

Posted in Behead Democracy (1-10-11), Video | Leave a comment

Napolitano considering CAIR demands to lighten airline security for Muslims

When is the moment when someone like Janet Napolitano decides, consciously and deliberately, that the United States must be destroyed? That the single greatest nation in the history of the world is not, never has been, and never should be, but rather is full of backward-thinking fools and bumpkins. That only she and her compatriots have the right ideas about how to live, based, I presume, on nothing wholly American, like the Constitution. When is that moment when she can say with a clear conscious that a double-standard of “us and them” is acceptable, that leaving Americans defenseless in the face of sabotage and death is acceptable, that people are as discountable and undeserving of respect as, say, jackrabbits? I get it that the Napolitanos and Obamas and Holders DO feel this way, and even why, but it’s that when that gets me. When is that moment when it becomes possible for an American to say: I can be irresponsible without consequence; I can turn my back on America.


Report: Napolitano considering Hamas-linked CAIR’s demands for Muslim women in airports, including the “self-pat-down”

The Department of Homeland Security needs to clarify its position here without delay. CAIR advised Muslim women in the press release quoted here that:

“Instead of the pat-down, you can always request to pat down your own scarf, including head and neck area”…

Two facts should be self-evident to demonstrate how outrageous this idea is. First, the whole point of being searched by someone else is to find concealed objects. A “self-pat-down” clearly defeats that purpose and is a completely unacceptable lapse in security. Let’s remember the stakes here: if something goes wrong in air security in the wrong place at the wrong time, people die. There is enough margin for error in the system already without adding this variable.

Secondly, the fact that Napolitano could even be considering such a measure highlights a double standard for special treatment that would not be considered for any other religious group, but is extended to Muslims without a second thought. What is going on here is a politically correct sort of anti-profiling: by all appearances, the air security apparatus bends over backwards to profile Muslims as not being a threat, in a way that it does not strive to reassure other demographic groups in the traveling public.

We are told time and again that Muslims in America just want to be treated like everyone else. Ergo, if you want equal treatment as a Muslim woman, participate in your social responsibilities equally even when it is awkward or inconvenient, rather than acting like some kind of demigoddess whose head and neck are untouchable by sullied human hands in the screening line. Your head and neck are as human as that of the next non-Muslim lady in line who is no more thrilled to be there than you are.

But let’s remember why we’re standing there waiting with our shoes in a plastic bin, and why so many security procedures have come into being in the first place: Islamic jihadists keep trying to bring down our planes, more and more with explosives concealed on their bodies.

“Napolitano considering allowing Muslim women to pat themselves down at Airports!” by Jack Minor for the Greeley Gazette, November 17 (thanks to C.):

With the holidays fast approaching, the Transportation Safety Agency has announced new security procedures requiring passengers selected for secondary screening to go through a machine that produces a full body scan producing a nude but grainy, black and white image. Passengers choosing to opt out of the scan will face a full body pat.

The problems these security measures pose should be discussed in the interest of the entire traveling public, pilots, and flight attendants, and not as the problem of one group.

The head of Homeland Security has indicated the government is considering the request of an Islamic organization that has suggested Muslim women be allowed to pat themselves down during a full body search that is part of new enhanced procedures at airports.

Since implementing the procedures, numerous complaints have arisen that the search is not a “pat-down” but rather feeling and grabbing along a person’s genitalia and other areas until they meet resistance. Critics have said the pat-downs would be considered sexual assault if performed elsewhere.

The TSA defends the procedures as necessary in light of last years “underwear bomber” and the recent issues involving printer cartridges being used in an attempt to blow up cargo planes.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, CAIR, has expressed concern with the TSA over the regulations and recommended special procedures for dealing with Muslim women. The organization issued a travel advisory for Muslims over the procedure.

In the advisory CAIR advises all Muslims to contact them and file a complaint with the TSA if they experience any “disturbing incidents” with the new procedures and they feel they have been unfairly singled out for screening.

It goes on to make special recommendations for Muslim women wearing a hijab covering their face. The advisory says women are to inform the officer they are only to pat down the head and neck and says “They should not subject you to a full-body or partial body pat-down.” They also recommend that women should be permitted to pat themselves down and “have the officers perform a chemical swipe of your hands.”

Barack Obama’s Homeland Security Czar, Janet Napolitano, is considering changes to the procedures to address the issues raised by CAIR….

Posted by Marisol on November 19, 2010 8:26 AM | 99 Comments

Posted in CAIR, national security, Political Islam | 1 Comment

Arlington imam, wife accused of marrying others to get U.S. citizenship

And, the hits just keep on coming. Political Islam seeks to impose itself on a free society by gradually getting that free society to accept sharia, one little piece at a time. Remember: there is no such thing as “man made law” in Islam. We have been warned.

An interesting follow up question to this story might be…. WHY would these Muslims want to do this? hm.

Bold Bracketed text is mine.



Arlington Imam, wife accused ot marrying others to get U.S. citizenship

By JASON TRAHAN / The Dallas Morning News

A prominent Islamic scholar who has battled accusations of extremist beliefs has been arrested, along with his wife, on federal charges that they married other people [while still married to each other, seems to be the charge here, but it took me a moment of two to tumble to that] to get U.S. citizenship.

Ibrahim Abdelrahman Dremali and Safaa Rashad Eissa were arrested by immigration agents, Arlington police, and the FBI on Oct. 6 on a warrant out of Des Moines, Iowa. They were released on their own recognizance after appearing before a federal judge in Fort Worth the same day.

They are scheduled to enter pleas Nov. 12 in Iowa on charges of conspiracy to defraud the United States, which can carry a five-year sentence, and procurement of citizenship or naturalization unlawfully, which can result in 10 to 25 years in prison.

Dremali, who earned degrees in geology and Islamic law in Cairo, immigrated to the U.S. in 1989 and has served as an imam . . . in south Florida, Iowa, and Austin [TX] and worked at Islamic schools.

This summer, he and his wife moved to a house on Virginia Lane near the Islamic Society of Arlington, where he helped lead a local Islamic school.

“They’re a very nice family,” [which has what to do with anything in this article?] said Guy Snodgrass, who owns the home the couple rents and is mayor pro tem of Dalworthington Gardens. “Having to go through all this; it has to be hard for his wife and two young children.” [Mr. Snodgrass, it’s better sometimes just not to say anything.]

Delayed by illness
Reached by phone this past week in Arlington, Dremali said he was too sick to talk. He was originally supposed to report to court Wednesday in Des Moines. His attorney, Alfredo Parrish, said he cannot travel. His attorney, Alfredo Parrish, sought a delay because doctors treating Dremali, who has hepatitis C and is awaiting a liver transplant at Baylor University Medical Center in Dallas [OMG! Dremali! Have you made sure this will not be an INFIDEL liver you’re desperately waiting for? Or . . horrors, a Jew’s liver?], said he cannot travel. Parrish declined to talk about the marriage fraud allegations or accusations that his client is an extremist. “I don’t think it’s appropriate to comment on what’s taken place in the past,” he said. [Well, one wonders what his defense for his client will be if it doesn’t include anything that happened in the past. I don’t think there are too many trials held for crimes-coming-later.]

He also declined to elaborate on meetings he has had with federal prosecutors in Manhattan [NY? Or is there a Manhattan, Iowa?] about Dremali and whether they result in additional charges.

Saeda Aljurf, director of the Madinah Academy early child development center, which is affiliated with the Islamic Society of Arlington, said Dremali had made a positive impression in the more than two years he has been consulting at their school. “He’s really inspired the children here.” [To do what? I wonder.]

She said he is not an extremist. “I’ve heard his lecture,” she said. “I haven’t heard him speaking out against the United States. We all love this country, and we’re against anybody who would say anything bad. We all live here.”

[Right. If memory serves, it was one Jamal Qaddura who, working out of the ISA (and working with 6 other fellow Believers) sued Joe Kaufman of AmericansAgainstHate.org for threatening “150,000 Muslims from having a good time” at Six Flags Over Texas in Oct. 2007. Kaufman’s threat? He held a demonstration outside the park with a dozen others who held posters alerting people that ICNA was behind the Muslim Day at 6 Flags. Qaddura and ISA’s lawsuit was eventually thrown out as baseless. Qaddura & Company’s end game: to stifle free speech. That’s ALWAYS the end game.

And let’s see . . . yes, Wadih El-Hage — bin Laden’s personal secretary — was a regular at the ISA back in the day. El-Hage was an Al-Qaida member convicted of conspiring in the 1998 U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania, and is now serving life in prison at the Supermax facility in Colorado. Homegrown jihad, anyone?

You want more, Ms. Aljurf? Okay, in February, 2010, Kimberly Al-Homsi, a regular at the Arlington mosques around town, including but not limited to the ISA, was arrested after leading the police on a chase through Arlington & Fort Worth after police tried to pull over Al-Homsi after getting a 911 call that a person in a pickup had pointed a weapon at the caller (which, maybe not incidentally, was just about 2 miles from the FIRST event at the new Cowboys stadium in Arlington). When the police finally stopped her they found 3 pipe bombs in her pickup. She’s gotten 10 years in prison for all of that.

And, just so you know, Qaddura & Company held a rally (totally approved by the ISA, ISNA, ICNA, CAIR, the MSA, the fiqh council, and all other Muslim Brotherhood affiliates) in late 2008 that called all Gazans (Palestinians) to repel all the vicious attacks on the poor Lebanese Muslim victims of the Hizballah/Israel war. And with hutzpah galore, he held it in the Levitt Pavilion (a town square owned by a Jewish foundation. The spokespeople for the foundation were not pleased to hear that Q&Co were given permission to use it for the purpose they did).

Yes, I’m sure Ms. Aljurf has every reason to feel sure no one would think to screw with the kids’ heads in a mosque in Arlington, TX.]
. . .
After Dremali emigrated to the U.S., he co-founded the Islamic Center of Boca Raton in 1998. In 2000, the Gaza native participated in a pro-Palestinian rally in Miami that featured the burning of Israeli flags and a mock funeral for Palestinians killed in the Israeli conflict. According to a published report, Dremali told the crowd “not to be sad for those who were martyred, and to not be afraid to die for what they believe in.”

After the 9/11 terrorist attacks, Dremali denied making the statement amid criticism from conservative bloggers about his role in the rally and other associations.

In 2002, Adham Hassoun, a Palestinian activist and computer programmer in Florida, was detained on immigration charges. Dremali was one of four people called to speak about Hassoun’s “peaceful and generous character” at a hearing, a court record shows.

Hassoun attended the same Fort Lauderdale mosque as Jose Padilla and was thought to have helped convert him to Islam. Padilla was later accused of planning a dirty bomb attack in the U.S., but authorities ultimately convicted him, and Hassoun, of coordinating aid to al-Qaeda. . . . Dremali later said he barely knew Hassoun.

“You can judge a person by the company he keeps,” wrote Joe Kaufman, . . . in one of several blog posts accusing Dremali of being a radical Islamist. . . . Last week, Kaufman said in an interview with The Dallas Morning News that he is not surprised to hear of Dremali’s arrest. “Regardless if they prosecute him on terrorism or immigration, I think it’s a good thing to take him off the streets,” he said.

Kaufman has also highlighted a more than $16,000 donation by Dremali’s Islamic Center of Boca Raton to the Global Relief Foundation [that would be a Palestinian Hamas front], one of several Muslim charities shut down by the Bush administration for funding international terrorism.

Dremali has said that he did not know Global Relief had terrorist ties when the donation was made. He has long denied being an extremist and has never been charged with any terrorism-related crimes. He has spoken out several times about how he and his family have been threatened and harassed since 9/11. [Well, sure. SOP: Me, victim; Americans: haters.]

Citing anti-Islamic harassment, Dremali left Florida around 2005 and became the imam at the Islamic Center of Des Moines. In 2006, he gave an interview to a local television station that was reporting on outrage in the international Muslim community over Danish cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad. Physical depictions of the prophet are considered offensive in Islam, but Dremali condemned violent protests that had erupted in Europe. “Violence is not Islamic,” Dremali said. [Really. You sure have me fooled on that one.]

By 2009, Dremali was the director at the Islamic Center of Greater Austin. [My goodness, this guy gets around.] He also taught Islamic studies at the Austin Peace Academy, a Muslim school. [From the APA Web site: “The Board of Trustees (BT) of the Islamic Center of Greater Austin (ICGA) is the highest governing authority of Austin Peace Academy.” Oooo, cozy. We have a Muslim org vouching for a Muslim school. Certainly convinces me that Dremali couldn’t harbor any extremists ideas.]

In May, a grand jury in Iowa accused [indicted?] Dremali of marrying an American citizen in Broward County, Florida, shortly after coming to the U.S. in 1989. Dremali swore on government forms that he was single at the time, even though he had married Eissa in 1987 in Egypt, the indictment states. He divorced his American wife in 1994, the indictment states.

The indictment alleges[? indictments allege?] that in 1991, Eissa came to the U.S. In 1994, she married a man in Fort Lauderdale and divorced him March 26, 1997. A week later, she married Dremali a second time in the U.S., according to the indictment.

During a December 2009 interview with a customs official in San Antonio, Eissa said she had never been married before her first U.S. husband.

Posted in Political Islam, sharia law, terrorism, Texas, U.S. Constitution | Leave a comment

The Offense Test: revealing intolerance in Islam

From Daniel Greenfield today… a revealing look at why Islam is the enemy of free speech. Bold emphasis is mine.



Posted: 24 Oct 2010 07:55 PM PDT
The Offense Test is very simple. If another driver on the highway flashes me the middle finger, it is generally accepted that he is a jackass. If I try to kill him in response, it is generally accepted that I am unfit for civil society and should be locked up.

But the Offense Test is more than just a way to screen out homicidal maniacs, it also screens out groups that are incapable of reconciling themselves to free speech. And in Europe and America, from the days when Salman Rushdie had to live in hiding to the present day, when Molly Norris has had to abandon her career as a cartoonist and go into hiding– Islam has failed the Offense Test in the worst way possible.

Living in a free society that is not rendered artificially homogeneous by speech codes and guardians of morality, means being willing to ignore offensive speech against your person and your beliefs. That means setting aside the barbaric honor-shame codes of the tribal society, with its value system in which every man is only worth as much or as little as the honor of his tribe and his family, for the ability to distinguish threats from insults.

Under the honor-shame code, an insult can be worse than a threat, because to deprive a man of honor, is worse than killing him. And that honor derives from his tribe, his family and he is perceived. Under honor-shame codes, when a man’s wife, daughter or other female relative disobey him, they shame and dishonor him, and he may mutilate or kill them to regain his honor. Similarly, if an outsider ridicules his god, the insult must be repaid with blood. To fail to do so is to live with shame in his own eyes and those of his compatriots.

Operating under the honor-shame code, in a free society where women are considered to have equal rights and free speech is more sacred, than sacred icons, the Muslim man is constantly on the verge of inflicting violence inside and outside the family. It takes only a straw to break the camel’s back, his daughter kissing a strange boy, a Fatwa about foreign troops in his country or a bad day at work. It’s not so much the nature of the actual offense that matters, only the religious and cultural “hair trigger” that Islam cultivates in its followers. And while the honor-shame code is not limited to Muslims, only the Muslim world has managed to turn the honor-shame trigger into a global tripwire, with cartoons in Denmark leading to killings in Pakistan.

Muslims may decry talk of plans for the Caliphate as a conspiracy theory or Islamophobia, but when they act collectively through the UN via the OIC and through violence and intimidation to restrict any speech that they dislike, then they are effectively attempting to impose the speech codes of their religious legal system on the entire world. And billions of Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Jews and others, should not be expected to react well to the imposition of a system that leaves them as second class citizens, liable to be demonized as infidels, idolaters and the children of pigs and apes, without the right or freedom to respond.

Western apologists for Islam insist that tolerance lies in not offending Muslims, but that is not what tolerance is. Tolerance means that we tolerate the offensive, not that we have it cleared away from us by the censorship of the state or the violence or the mob. There is nothing wrong with being sensitive to other people’s feelings, when such sensitivity is mutually reciprocated, and when it is not dictated by fear of violence. But when sensitivity is motivated by a fear of violence, then it is no longer an act of empathy, but of cowardice. There is nobility in not stepping on the downtrodden, but none in cringing before an angry mob. To censor free speech in the face of anguish may be a kindness, but it is a crime in the face of bloodshed.

Yet the same liberals who insist that WW2 GI’s were fighting for the right to gay marriage, insist that we must censor anything that offends Muslims in order to protect US soldiers in Afghanistan. Yet, what if anything, are American soldiers fighting for if not to preserve such a basic freedom. What could we hope to gain by appeasing the Muslim world that would outweigh our Bill of Rights? Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer appears to disagree, reviving WWI era arguments about shouting fire in a crowded theater. But the question here is not one of censoring speech in the name of patriotism, but of avoiding violence by suppressing speech that might trigger the murderers to kill.

Yet no free society can exist by allowing the murderers or would be murderers to set the terms of its free speech. To do so is to submit tyranny. If we allow that to happen, then we no longer have either a Constitution or even self-government, all our laws and practices would be subject to review by any Muslim cleric with a microphone and a grudge. That is the system that the vaunted European “tolerance” has ushered in, where 3 year olds in England are being monitored for racism, Jews are fleeing Europe at a rate unprecedented since the rise of the Nazis, and dogs are barred from buses. But despite the fearful shadow of this draconian tolerance, matters are no better. Once the murderers are allowed to determine what freedoms a society will have, the killing never stops. Not until all the freedoms do.

That is why the Offense Test is so crucial, because it screens out people and groups who think this way. It is possible to live without the Offense Test, but only as a homogenized society in which speech is tightly controlled, and every man is expected to be ready to kill for the slightest offense, and every woman must be escorted everywhere by her husband or father. But such a society will be not be a multicultural one, it will have one dominant religion, culture and gender– with all others reduced to second-class citizenship. Muslims have already set up such societies all across the globe, and they are welcome to live in them, at least until they choose to reform them into some semblance of civilization. But instead they propose to remake the First World along the same lines, and they have no shortage of Western apologists who are eager to help them achieve that goal.

Their argument of the apologists always comes down to blaming the victims of Islamic violence for the initial offense. Not only does this argument come down to the same position taken by the Grand Mufti of Australia, when he declared that rape victims were “uncovered meat” who were just asking for it, but even were it true that Muslim violence is only a response to some provocation or offense, then that alone demonstrates that Islam is incompatible with participation in civil society.

If Muslims cannot see a woman in a short skirt without trying to rape her, then they are unfit to be members of society in which women have the right to dress as they please. If Muslims cannot see a cartoon of their prophet, without trying to murder the artist who drew it, then they cannot be members of any society with free speech. And if Muslims cannot give their loyalty to the country that they live in, rather than to the angry clerics of Saudi Arabia or Pakistan, than they had best move back to where their hearts truly lie. Otherwise their new country will be forced to judge every foreign policy decision not based on its own interests, but on whether its citizens will be subject to terrorist attacks from its domestic Muslims.

For Muslims, the Offense Test will serve to determine, whether they can live outside the Muslim world. For now, they are failing the test, and failing it badly. Muslim immigration has not spread tolerance, but intolerance, not love but fear, and not knowledge, but ignorance. It is up to Muslims themselves to reverse that trend, by either passing the Offense Test and proving that they can tolerate being offended by the variety of views and images in a multicultural society, or disengaging from a non-Muslim world whose freedoms and perspectives they cannot learn to tolerate.

The choice is simple enough, and the choice is theirs.

Posted in free speech, Political Islam, sharia law | 1 Comment

Andre Carson and Dr. Marvin Scott race: ISNA or American principles?

Chris Gaubatz is the son of David Gaubatz, who is the co-author of the Muslim Mafia, a best-selling book which exposes the Muslim Brotherhood’s affiliate, CAIR, the Council on American Islamic Relations. Chris’s infiltration into CAIR’s highest ranks, and his ability to collect data, made the book possible. (Pictured here is Andre Carson and Chris Gaubatz at an ISNA Conference, Columbus OH 2008).

Carson is running for re-election in the US Rep seat District 7 in Indianapolis, IN against Republican Dr. Marvin Scott. Carson is undoubtedly playing his Muslim Brotherhood connections as close to the vest as he can. Not even mentioning it, most likely. He is also likely saying as little as he can about being a Muslim, but if he must say something, it’ll be that he’s a moderate.

He’s not a moderate, proved here by being at an event put on by ISNA, the Islamic Society of North America, the #1 MB affiliate umbrella that organizes, runs, and/or starts the MB’s “charities” or “outreach” organizations. Carson posed for this picture in Columbus, OH, in 2008.

By attending this event, Carson proves that he buys into the MB’s creed: “Allah is our objective; the Koran is our law; the Prophet is our leader; jihad is our way; [none of which have anything to do with serving the U.S. (let alone Indy) or protecting the Constitution, huh?] and death for the sake of Allah is the highest of our aspirations.”

This is simply more ammo for those of you who can have any influence on Carson’s race.

For those of you who want to help support Dr. Scott, go here: http://www.drmarvinscottforcongress.com/


Posted in ELected officials support sharia, Political Islam | 5 Comments

FBI and Hamas? Friends or foes?

Andrew Breitbart & Frank Gaffney on the FBI allowing a HAMAS terrorist into its inner workings, and a healthy discussion on Sharia and its ultimate meaning for our country (podcast) . . .


Why is [the] FBI Helping Hamas?
by John Davidson
“Americans, YOU are the government. You must hold those charged with protecting you accountable for doing so.”**********************************************************************************

And the original articles on this:

Patrick Poole’s Article on FBI’s Denial from 9/30 PM

Patrick Poole’s Article – Comprehensive Look at Mustapha and the FBI’s Failure

Washington Times Article

Posted in national security, sharia law, terrorism | 2 Comments

Islam: Not the "religion" Americans think it is

I like this guy’s opening statement: “One thing is certain, Islam is not a religion by anything Americans believe one to be – not even close.” It just gets better from there. The original article was from New Medial Journal here.



Demoting Islam’s Religion Status

Saturday, 25 September 2010 15:08 Martel Sobieskey

One thing is certain, Islam is not a religion by anything Americans believe one to be – not even close. In fact, Islam is the antithesis of what we deem to be religious. Above all, Islam is a totalitarian political machine of blood thirsty conquest which zealously advocates the downfall of the U.S. government. Jesus said, “My kingdom is not of this world…” because he was 100% non-political.

In extreme contrast, Mohammed and the Koran bellicosely command your kingdom is my kingdom, surrender or die! Let’s be to the point. It is sheer madness, exceedingly irresponsible, criminally negligent, and strategically suicidal to continue granting religion status to an absolutely aggressive and implacable ideology that demands the destruction of our government and all other religions.

It is well past time, the truthful facts be told about Islam. Our leadership and intelligence community have lied and lied again, referring to Islam as a religion of peace. If Islam is to be categorized as a religion – then it must be called what it truthfully is – a religion of war. Unfortunately our leadership has become so inept, they have chosen to be in denial of this obvious fact, and entertain fanciful notions – that by calling a “blood thirsty tiger” a “bunny rabbit” it will magically transform into one.

This means, we now have America’s Sugar Plum Fairy National Security Policy: All of the Islamofascists can be won over by simply labeling them “friends”. How dare we even utter the word enemy, which might upset them. We now have a national security mantra: Islam is perfect! Islam is perfect! Islam is perfect!

The purpose of this article is to introduce that Islam’s religion status is undeserving, that it should never have been granted in the first place, and that its religion status should be immediately rescinded.

Why? Because Islam whether you call it moderate, militant, main stream, traditional or radical is a relentless foe inherently programmed to conqueror its host nation. Fail to understand this point and Islam will continue “trashing” civil liberties, shedding bloody pandemonium, wreaking havoc, litigating as warfare, demanding special privileges, and instigating anarchy until its host country suffers irreparable harm if not outright defeat. Such is the virulent modus operandi being used by Islam in England, Spain, India, France, Thailand, Holland, Bali, Lebanon, Denmark, Sweden, Philippines, Russia, America and elsewhere.

Perhaps, this is why Dr. Paul Williams author of “The Dunes of Doomsday” so truthfully and valiantly states in Chapter 1 “Refusing to Identify the Enemy”:

“The enemy is Islam. Not a fringe group within the body of believers…Not radical Islam as if a faction can be separated from the “mainstream” Islam. But Islam itself, as expressed by the life and teachings of Muhammad…”

An Imposter Religion

To put it bluntly Islam’s religion status should be rescinded because it is a wolf in sheep’s clothing, a Trojan horse, an imposter religion that has arrived on our shore with malicious intent, deathly determined to replace our constitution with the Koran, and turn America into an Islamic nation controlled by Sharia law. Robert Spencer in his excellent book, “Stealth Jihad” (How Radical Islam Is Subverting America Without Guns or Bombs), explains how so-called moderate Islam is having greater success at invading America than its counterpart militant Islam. Shockingly, one may rightly conclude that America is now being conquered without Islam even having to fire a shot. Have we really become that docile, self complacent and pathetic? The answer is Yes!

The Sham of Moderate Islam

Does this mean that even so-called moderate Muslims are hostile to America? It certainly does. Moderate Muslims support the conquest of America with fervor equal to that of the militant Muslims. They cunningly play the role of the “good cop” in their good cop, bad cop charade deceiving we gullible Americans. In fact, the “two hands” of Islam aspire to choke the life out of America. One hand is called militant Muslims; the other hand is called moderate Muslims. These “two hands” work together, in their Koranically mandated asphyxiation pogrom, of strangling America into submission. This point cannot be overemphasized.

In 1974 Algerian President Boumendienne made a prophetic statement to the United Nations General Assembly:

“One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere of this planet to burst into the northern one. But not as friends. Because they will burst in to conquer, and they will conquer by populating it with their children. Victory will come to us from the wombs of our women.”

How accurately prophetic he was. Today, one can see no assimilation by Muslims in their host nations and they frequently exhibit open hostility turning entire cities into Moslem enclaves which the police are reluctant to enter. In addition, their birthrate is four times the European average creating a large cash deficient within the social welfare system. It is hardly an exaggeration to say, the Moslem immigration is like a “swarm of invading locusts” devouring everything in their path.

Dutch Politician Geert Wilders, having suffered firsthand the “devouring” of his nation by so-called moderate Islam, unflinchingly states in his article, “The Islamization of Europe”…”There is no Moderate Islam”. The United States, like all besieged western democracies, must heed Geert Wilders warning if they wish to protect themselves. Clearly, the safe harbor of religion status enables the “two hands” of Islam to launch clandestine raids upon their host nation, sapping at its vitals from within.

A Road to Hell

The severity of the moderate Islam invasion is thoroughly understood by Islamic experts like Amil Amani. In his article, “A Bridge to ‘Moderate’ Islam Is In Fact a Road to Hell.” He emphatically warns there is no such thing as moderate Islam and to call it so is an oxymoron, a contradiction. Specifically he states:

“Since moderate Islam is oxymoronic, any moderacy in Islam is in fact incompatible and in conflict with essential Islam, its power structure and its controlling proponents…Islam is not personally or spiritually relevant. It is political, which is why it may never separate itself from government. Adherence is not a matter of voluntary devotion, but of the law, and violators are severely punished, including capital punishment…”

Another enlightened expert who has personally witnessed that moderate Islam is a road to hell is Brigitte Gabriel. In her book, “Because They Hate” she gives a clarion call describing how the ruse of moderate Islam turned her home country of Lebanon into a “living nightmare.” She states:

“We were renowned for our hospitality, good heartedness, and generosity, just as America is known for the same qualities today. Sadly, those same qualities were the cause of our destruction…We did not realize that the intolerant Islamic side of our culture was gaining strength on the back of our western openness and pride in diversity.”

Most likely, Brigitte Gabriel would agree that providing religion status to Islam, believing main stream Islam to be moderate, was a major contributor to the destruction of Lebanon. The key point is that so-called moderate Muslims are as fiercely intolerant as militant Muslims, but are more skillful at concealing their agenda and deceiving their host nation until the time is right for them to strike. Brigitte Gabriel tells how usually peaceful Muslim neighbors who had befriended them for decades all of a sudden rose up to kill non-Muslims.

Murderous Intolerance

Such murderous intolerance is fully entrenched within Islam. The so-called moderates fully support these murderous attacks in their “hidden hearts”, rarely paying even lip service to the contrary. Their silence has been “deafening.” Why? Because they dare not challenge the inviolate precedents set by their prophet which would be a capital offense. For example, in 623 A.D. Mohammed was infuriated with the female poet Asma Bint Marwan for criticizing him, and sent his henchman to kill her and her five children. They ripped the infant from her breast and hacked it to pieces before her very eyes. They then made her watch the murder of her other four children, before raping and stabbing her repeatedly to death. After the butchery Mohammed told his henchman, “You have done a service to Allah and his Messenger.”

The killing of persons who criticize Islam has never abated and perhaps is even more alive today than in the 7th century. A few years ago in the U.S. an Egyptian Christian, his wife and two children had their throats cut for challenging Islam, mistakenly believing our free speech laws would protect them. Nearly every day one hears of some gruesome murder, decapitation, or other violent crime committed by contemporary Muslims who are emulating the example of their prophet.

The Heart War

99.9% of all Muslims have a deeply held secret agenda (wish) that Islam will conquer their host country and turn it into an Islamic nation such is their indelible religious conditioning. This obvious fact has been completely neglected, ignored, avoided and shunned by the leadership of western democracies to their great detriment, including America.

Fortunately we have one Islamic expert who is trying to awaken our leadership and his sleeping counterparts in the defense department and intelligence community. He is truly a “shinning star” and a person of insightful wisdom who should be promoted to the highest positions. Major Stephen Collins Coughlin has written a 333 page thesis entitled, “To Our Great Detriment”. On pages 171-175 he provides a quote that reveals the concealed heart of so-called moderate Muslims. The Caliph (Pope) of the Ottoman empire spelled out what has always been the irrefutable law for all Muslims without exception:

“The heart war – and that is the lowest form of the war. And it is that the Muslim should believe in his heart that the infidels are enemies to him and to his religion, and that he should desire their disappearance and the destruction of their power, And no Muslim can be imagined who is not under obligation to this degree of war. Verily, all the people of the faith are under obligation to this amount without any question whatever, in whatever place they may be…”


Permit me to make a grim prediction: Any country that continues to provide religion status to Islam believing that moderate Muslims will save the day has been “sucker punched” and is guaranteed to suffer great havoc and disruptive chaos. The proof is undeniable, look at the mayhem Islam has inflicted upon all western democracies over the past 20 years. The self destructive formula is simple: provide religion status to the sham of moderate Islam and your country will suffer great devastation.

Never before in human history has a nation’s leadership and intelligence community been so easily duped, confounded, played for fools, infiltrated and manipulated by enemy propagandists and apologists. Our leadership has become so pusillanimous in the face of Islamic bullying and brow beating, they have become their lackeys, aiding and abetting the invasion of the very nation they are suppose to protect. The situation is critical. The demoting of Islam’s religion status will turn the tide and send a clear-cut message to Islam that the dust of Allah is no longer befogging our vision enabling them to conqueror us.


Martel Sobieskey has 36 years research experience in the field of religious conditioning and its relationship to warfare. He is greatly alarmed that American politicians, military commanders, educators, journalists, intelligence analysts, security and police personnel have failed to comprehend the deeply entrenched jihadist conditioning inherent in all of Islam – moderates included.

The above article, re-published with the author’s permission, was originally published at The New Media Journal

Posted in Christianity, national security, Political Islam | 3 Comments

Texas Takes Aim at anti-Christian, Pro-Islamic Textbooks

Approximately an hour ago I posted about the Hartford Common Council dropping Islamic prayers from the Monday meeting, after being pressured by non-Muslims. Now in Texas we see of another example of America turning against Islam. This time it is in the classrooms, which is obviously great news for our side.

~ Dorrie


Texas education board to consider rule on Islam’s portrayal in textbooks

AUSTIN – Just when it appeared the State Board of Education was done with the culture wars, the panel is about to wade into the issue of what students should learn about Islam.

The board will consider a resolution next week that would warn publishers not to push a pro-Islamic, anti-Christian viewpoint in world history textbooks.

Members of the board’s social conservative bloc asked for the resolution after an unsuccessful candidate for a board seat called on the panel to head off any bias against Christians in new social studies books. Some contend that “Middle Easterners” are increasingly buying into companies that publish textbooks.

A preliminary draft of the resolution states that “diverse reviewers have repeatedly documented gross pro-Islamic, anti-Christian distortions in social studies texts” across the U.S. and that past social studies textbooks in Texas also have been “tainted” with pro-Islamic, anti-Christian views.

The resolution cites examples in past world history books – no longer used in Texas schools – that devoted far more lines of text to Islamic beliefs and practices than to Christian beliefs and practices.

In addition, the measure cites some books that dwelled on the Christian Crusaders massacre of Muslims in Jerusalem in 1099, while censoring Muslim massacres of Christians there in 1244 and at Antioch in 1268 – “implying that Christian brutality and Muslim loss of life are significant, but Islamic cruelty and Christian deaths are not.”


The resolution states that pro-Islamic, anti-Christian half-truths, selective disinformation and false editorial stereotypes “still roil” some social studies textbooks nationwide, including “sanitized definitions of ‘jihad’ that exclude religious intolerance or military aggression against non-Muslims … which undergirds worldwide Muslim terrorism.”
Posted in Political Islam, pro-Islam bias, sharia law, Texas, textbooks | 1 Comment